|
|
 |
专题栏目 |
 |
|
相关文章 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Validity of Reliability Measures in Threshold Perimetry |
热 |
|
| Validity of Reliability Measures in Threshold Perimetry |
|
作者：Xiaolei … 文章来源：广东省汕头市东厦北路广厦新城515041 点击数：1634 更新时间：2005/6/28 10:19:49 
|
|
| Purpose: to evaluate and compare the validity of reliability indices (False positive, false negative, and fixation loss) used in SITA and Full threshold perimetry.
Methods: two samples of 74 glaucoma patients with early to moderately advanced visual field loss were selected from outpatient clinic of Manchester Royal eye hospital. All there patients had prior experience on the certain perimetry. Test-retest variability compensated by variability-threshold relationship was measured in the two samples to play as a gold standard of reliability in this experiment. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between reliability indices (FP, FN and Fixation loss) and test-retest variability.
Result: a poor relationship was found between reliability indices and test-retest variability in both full threshold and SITA group (R2 is 0.0516 and 0.169 in full threshold and SITA respectively). As the most significant index, False negative contributed 3% and 15% of variability in each group.
Conclusion: the reliability indices now used in threshold perimetry are not good enough to predict the variability of patient.
|
|
|
| 会议投稿录入：aya610 责任编辑：毛进 |
|
|
上一篇会议投稿： 超声生物显微镜在慢性低眼压监测中的作用
下一篇会议投稿： Visual outcomes after transscleral fixation of foldable intraocular lenses |
|
|
| 【字体：小 大】【发表评论】【加入收藏】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口】 |
|
 网友评论：（只显示最新10条。评论内容只代表网友观点，与本站立场无关！） |
| 没有任何评论 |
|
|
|
|
